PHAs are developing innovative strategies to enable more voucher residents to live in high opportunity neighborhoods with access to resources critical to their long-term success. There is considerable research suggesting that HCV program participants, especially those with young children, achieve better outcomes when they are able to use their voucher in a safe neighborhood with access to quality schools. CLPHA, along with the Poverty and Race and Research Action Council (PRRAC) sponsors the biennial National Housing Mobility Conference, which features presenters from the realms of research, policy, and practice to bring attendees up to date on developments in the field and spark discussions that will push the work forward.
The Council of Large Public Housing Authorities (CLPHA) is a national non-profit organization that works to preserve and improve public and affordable housing through advocacy, research, policy analysis and public education. Our membership of more than seventy large public housing authorities (“PHAs”) own and manage nearly half of the nation’s public housing program, administer more than a quarter of the Housing Choice Voucher program, and operate a wide array of other housing programs. They collectively serve over one million low income households including families with children, seniors, and persons with disabilities.
A major goal of CLPHA is to ensure the preservation and improvement of federally assisted housing through adequate funding for the Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher Programs. These investments are critical to enable PHAs to keep up with necessary improvements to their housing stock that will benefit the families and seniors that live in public housing and to improve their education, employment, and health outcomes. The availability of affordable housing positively impacts life outcomes, and as a result, significantly reduces costs within other systems. We recommend the following funding levels for these key housing programs. When our calculations are not formula driven, they are principally based upon need.
Please note that our initial FY 2018 funding recommendations are based on the best information available at the time. We may submit revised funding recommendations to Congress when more detailed and timely information, such as the President’s FY 2018 budget request and Congressional Justifications, become available.
|
Program |
FY 2018 Funding Needs |
|---|---|
|
Public Housing Operating Fund |
$5.349 billion |
|
Public Housing Capital Fund |
$5.0 billion |
|
Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI) |
$200 million |
|
Resident Opportunity and Supportive Services |
$35 million |
|
Emergency Capital Needs |
$21.5 million |
|
Jobs Plus |
$15 million |
|
Public Housing Financial and Physical Assessment Activities |
$10 million |
|
Rental Assistance Demonstration |
$50 million |
|
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Renewal Funding |
$19.39 billion |
|
HCV Administrative Fees |
$2.284 billion |
|
Consolidated Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS) |
$95 million |
|
HUD-VASH Vouchers |
$75 million |
|
Tenant Protection Vouchers |
$165 million |
|
Contract Administrators for Project-Based Section 8 |
Fully fund |
|
Section 8 Project Based Rental Assistance |
$11.4 billion |
|
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) |
$3.3 billion |
|
HOME Investment Partnerships Program |
$1.2 billion |
Explanation of FY 2018 Funding Needs
Public Housing Operating Fund - Based on the current Operating Fund rule, and current HUD methodologies for calculating the PEL, UEL, and Rental Income. Eligible Unit Months also reflect available HUD data on occupied units and adjustments related to RAD.
Public Housing Capital Fund - The estimate addresses current accrual needs and a portion of the capital needs backlog. Annual accrual needs were estimated at more than $3.4 billion based upon the congressionally mandated study by Abt Associates Inc. in 2010. The Capital Needs Assessment also found a capital needs backlog of $26 billion. The amount requested would make critical repairs and pursue much-needed programs of modernization to help reduce the backlog.
Housing Choice Voucher Renewal Funding - The amount requested is expected to ensure the renewal of assistance for all voucher-assisted low-income households served in 2017. No offset is assumed in this recommendation.
Tenant Protection Vouchers – The requested amount includes a set-aside of $15 million for public housing authorities to use TPVs in conjunction with RAD to make more conversions feasible. PHAs would continue to be eligible for additional TPVs for other eligible PHA activities as in prior years.
Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) – In addition to the requested amount, CLPHA supports eliminating the current unit cap on public housing conversions. Eliminating the cap will enable more properties to leverage private financing for capital improvements, enabling these properties to remain a source of critical affordable housing for low-income seniors and families.
Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI) - As has been the practice in previous years, CLPHA recommends that two-thirds of the funds be reserved for applications in which a public housing authority is the lead applicant or a co- applicant. Large capital grants through programs like Choice Neighborhoods are among the most effective tools to help PHAs address the needs of severely distressed public housing developments by attracting private capital and transforming communities into thriving, mixed-income neighborhoods with reduced crime and increased opportunities for residents.
Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS) – Of the amount requested, $85 million should be reserved for PHAs. This funding level is needed to maintain funding for all existing program coordinators in the consolidated Public Housing and Section 8 FSS program. The additional funding would support expansion of the program to include Section 8 PBRA properties as well as expansion of FSS in voucher and public housing programs.
Section 8 Project Based Rental Assistance - We support fully funding this account by providing for 12 months of funding for all contracts from January through December 2018. This estimate does not assume HUD’s implementation of the HOTMA’s medical/disability expense deduction threshold for elderly and disabled households up from 3 percent to 10 percent of their gross income before such expenses can be counted as a deduction. We support adequate funding to ensure that all assisted-households will be able to continue to be served in the upcoming year.
Housing Choice Voucher Administrative Fees - At this time, we believe this figure would be sufficient to fund all PHAs at 100 percent of their eligibility based on the fee rates in effect immediately prior to the enactment of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (QHWRA). This amount also includes $20 million in special administrative fee funding to support PHAs’ administration of tenant protection vouchers and special purpose vouchers, including, but not limited to: HUD-Veterans Assisted Supportive Housing (VASH), Mainstream, and Family Unification Program Vouchers. This amount includes only administrative fees for renewal vouchers. It does not include administrative fees for any potential incremental vouchers.
Before HUD Secretary Carson even made his appearance in the meeting ballroom, his presence was felt. With Rep. Waters’ speech ahead of Carson’s keynote address, pointing specifically to his lack of housing experience and calling upon him to listen carefully to the experienced housing leaders that were in attendance, the new HUD Secretary had a room full of people anxiously anticipating what he would say in response.
King County Housing Authority Executive Director and CLPHA Board President Stephen Norman introduced Secretary Carson by calling attention to some of his career accomplishments, including becoming the youngest major division director at Johns Hopkins Children’s Center when he was the director of pediatric neurosurgery at just 33 years old, and where he served for almost 30 years. Secretary Carson was the recipient of the Spingarn Medal, the highest honor bestowed by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and the Presidential Medal of Freedom Award, the highest civilian award in the nation.
Perhaps surprisingly, the Secretary announced that he agreed with Rep. Waters on many of the points she made in her address, and he alluded to those in the room as the boots on the ground who know what people in ivory towers do not. He also acknowledged our need to work together by indicating that, “if we’re all in a sinking boat, it doesn’t matter what part of the boat we’re in.” Perhaps this was to serve as a reminder of the task at hand: that everyone in the room should prepare to listen to what the other side has to say.
Secretary Carson described his upbringing, which began in GI housing in Detroit before his parents divorced and he bounced around various places, including a home in Boston. He recalled how his neighbors, owners of some of the other GI units in his community, left an impression on him because they took immense pride in keeping their homes tidy and well-maintained. He talked about his mother, a woman with only a third grade education who worked hard to provide a foundation for her family despite the challenges of being a single mother, and he credited her for his career success.
CLPHA had the opportunity to pose a few questions to the Secretary. When asked about whether or not he would support the expansion of the MTW program, Secretary Carson was positive about continuing to find new and creative ways to provide housing support at the local level, and the forming of unique partnerships across sectors, including health and education, as well as public-private partnerships.
Along these lines, CLPHA President Stephen Norman pointed out to Secretary Carson that many CLPHA members have been deeply involved and committed to building partnerships with the education and health sectors, and we asked the Secretary if he would continue to support this work and identify opportunities that he sees for building on this foundation. Will HUD work with us to further these partnerships to improve outcomes?
Secretary Carson responded by describing HUD as a springboard to help people improve their lives, and not just in housing. He used phrasing that could have come out of CLPHA’s own Housing Is initiative, saying that housing practitioners need to work across silos, create synergy, and become more efficient at sharing ideas. He even asked attendees to think carefully about health and how it intersects with housing and suggested that it would be beneficial to implement the use of clinics within communities instead of emergency rooms.
Mr. Norman also asked Secretary Carson if he would support public housing as part of an infrastructure bill, to which he replied that he sees housing as a critical and major part of the infrastructure of this country, and he encouraged housers to use their resources in the most effective ways possible to while continuing to inform HUD of their successes and demonstrating their accomplishments.
Secretary Carson pledged to keep RAD going, and described it as an essential program to HUD now and moving forward. And, while he did not include much detail, he indicated that he would do everything he could to avoid wiping out vital assistance programs and defend the HUD budget. The Secretary said that he would look forward to the opportunity to collaborate with CLPHA members on important HUD policy issues.
CLPHA and Reno & Cavanaugh, PLLC 's comments on HUD's Proposed Implementation of Various Section 8 Voucher Provisions under the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization (HOTMA) Act of 2016 dated January 18, 2017.
Many CLPHA member PHAs participate in special purpose voucher programs, such as the Family Unification Program (FUP), the Department of Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Program (HUD-VASH), and the Non-Elderly Disabled (NED) program. These programs serve especially vulnerable low-income households who are in need of supportive services to ensure long-term housing stability. CLPHA members have created a variety of innovations to more effectively serve program participants.

